The Governing Body Arrangement -- Is It Scriptural?

Message

THE GOVERNING BODY ARRANGEMENT -- IS IT SCRIPTURAL?

As we all remember, the Watchtower Society teaches that the "Faithful Slave" is comprised of the anointed remnant as a composite group, left upon earth, to spearhead and take the lead in the "Lord's work." Today, these ones supposedly number to date, as of the writing of this article, approximately 8,570 earthwide. However, many Jehovah's Witnesses are beginning to find out, the cold truth, that these 8,570 members who supposedly make up the "anointed remnant," and "Faithful and Discreet" Slave, do not make the decisions for the organization at all, for Jehovah's Witnesses. No, they do not provide any direction whatsoever for the visible organization of Jehovah's Witnesses, as the "Faithful Slave" itself. No, these aforementioned 8,570 individuals, actually do NOT participate in giving out the spiritual "food" itself, to the worldwide organization of Jehovah's Witnesses. No, they do not participate in what Jesus described as being the inestimatable privilege of "giving the food at the proper time" at all. (Matthew 24:45)

No but, upon close investigation, we find in fact, the organization itself is actually controlled, directed and led by a small group of "professed" anointed Christians known as the "Governing Body." Yes, it is claimed that the Governing Body arrangement, fully empowered in December of 1975, is one that more fully harmonizes with 'governing arrangements' among first century Christians. Is that really the case? Let us make an examination of this matter.

JESUS COMMISSIONED A "GOVERNING BODY" ARRANGEMENT OR AN "APOSTOLIC" ARRANGEMENT -- WHICH?

It is true that Jesus appointed twelve apostles who had equal authority among his disciples. Later, other apostles were appointed or recognized as such namely Paul, Barnabas, and James the half brother of Jesus. (See Insight on the Scriptures, Vol. 1, pg. 1, 252, 3; Acts 14:14; Galatians 1:19; 2:9.) However, the scriptures clearly teach that the "apostles" had authority over the congregation and NOT a so-called "Governing Body" arrangement. In fact, the expression `Governing Body' is nowhere to be found anywhere in the Bible. We remember, Jesus appointed an `apostolic' arrangement and not a `Governing Body' arrangement. This thought is confirmed for us when we examine Paul's teachings to the congregation itself. Let's notice the order of authority established within the christian congregation arrangement. Paul wrote:

"And God has set the respective ones in the congregation, FIRST, apostles; second, prophets; third, teachers; then powerful works; then gifts of healings; helpful services, abilities to direct, different tongues. Not all are apostles, are they? Not all are prophets, are they? Not all are teachers, are they? Not all perform powerful works, do they?" -- 1 Corinthians 12:28

Also, Ephesians 4:11-16 where it states in part:

"And he gave some as APOSTLES, some as prophets, some as evangelizers, some as shepherds and teachers, with a view to the readjustment of the holy ones, for ministerial work, for the building up of the body of the Christ . . . "

Yes, in both instances, the "apostles" are listed FIRST in order and rank as far as congregational authority is concerned. An apostle could establish congregational procedures and methods. (1 Corinthians 4:17; 7:12) Individually, apostles could issue "commands" and orders to traveling overseers and congregational members to better expedite important matters. (Acts 17:14, 15; 1 Corinthians 16:1; Titus 1:5) A single apostle could even confer the authority to "command" upon other responsible individuals. (1 Timothy 1:3; Titus 2:15) Also, a single apostle could even expel unruly individuals from the congregation! — Please compare 1 Corinthians 5:5 with 1 Timothy 1:20.

Most Bible students will agree that the "apostles" really had authority in the initial stages of the forming of the congregation, but what about later? Yes, the Watchtower Society argues that we can find a first century example of the governing body in action, around 49 CE, when the issue of circumcision arose and united decision concerning it was made for the anointed congregation of God at that time. Let's examine that argument put forth by the Watchtower Society very closely at this time.

As we recall, the Watchtower Society states that around 49 CE when the issue of circumcision surfaced, the governing body of the first gathered to form a united policy for the entire body of first century christians at that time, foreshadowing the work of the modern day Governing Body of Jehovah's witnesses today. They claim that this particular arrangement, the Governing Body Arrangement, was a Divinely Approved arrangement from Jehovah, and thus appropriately implemented as the Central Policy Forming Body for all Jehovah's witnesses earthwide. In turn, this special arrangement, namely the Governing Body Arrangement would thus become the actual "Mouthpiece" of the mysterious Faithful & Discreet Slave Arrangement, that has been commissioned by Jesus to "give the food at the proper time." -- Matthew 24:45

At Acts 15th chapter, we can find the entire bible account of the circumcision issue among first century christians at Antioch. Acts 15:1, 2 tells us,

"And certain men came down from Judea and began to teach the brothers: 'Unless you get circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.' But when there had occurred no little dissension and disputing by Paul and Barnabas with them, they arranged for Paul and Barnabas and some others of them to go up to the apostles and older men in Jerusalem regarding this dispute."

So then, first off we must ask the question:

When the question initially arose among the first century disciples about whether circumcision should be mandatory for all gentile converts to christianity...think...isn't it true the Bible says Paul and Barnabas traveled as it says, to "the apostles AND older men in Jerusalem regarding this dispute?" Does the inspired account shown above not say this?

Yes, this is a very interesting question. Let us examine it scripturally.

CIRCUMCISION ISSUE ACTUALLY SETTLED BY WHOM?

If we carefully consider the whole explanation given by the Watchtower Society on this matter, we find the Watchtower magazine admits this important point about the so-called "governing body" of the first century:

"The Bible provides only limited details about the composition of the early governing body, most of the information being in Acts chapter 15. That account indicates that in 49 CE the group of men forming the governing body consisted of "the apostles and older men in Jerusalem." Who were these?" (Watchtower, 12/1/85, pg. 31, 2, under "Questions From Readers")

To further this thought, the December 15, 1979 Watchtower magazine makes this intriguing comment:

"The Christian congregation or the `faithful and discreet slave' class started out on Pentecost of 33 CE with twelve members on its governing body, and that governing body located at Jerusalem was increased from the twelve apostles of Christ to include other elders of the Jerusalem congregation. So the governing body at that vital Jerusalem council included the eleven surviving apostles of Christ, and the disciple James who seems to have been chairman for the occasion, also Judas (Barsabbas) and Silas as `leading men among the brothers,' yes, `prophets,' and doubtless Paul and Barnabas. That means at least sixteen anointed Christians associated with the governing body back there at Jerusalem . . . ." (See Watchtower, 12/15/71, pg. 759, par. 2.)

Yes, according to the Watchtower Society, in the first century, the so-called governing body was comprised of sixteen members. If you look at the picture on page 686 of the November 15, 1971, Watchtower magazine, you will be able to count sixteen men who made up the so-called first century governing body. However, is that an accurate statement, in itself.

Well, let us notice this comment at Acts 15:5 which is an inspired eye-witness account of who was actually present at this particular so-called Governing Body ONLY meeting. It states:

"Yet, some of those of the sect of the Pharisees that had believed rose up from their seats and said: `It is necessary to circumcise them and charge them to observe the law of Moses.'"

Yes, did you notice, there were more people in attendance than those 16 men, namely those (formerly) of the " 'sect of the Pharisees that believed,' " gathered there to settle this pressing issue of whether circumcision was to become mandatory for all gentile converts to christianity. Yes, there were more people present at this particular meeting, than merely 16 individuals, as the Watchtower Society claims.

But someone may say,

"If you read the next verse (vs. 6), you will see that the apostles and older men gathered together AFTER that initial meeting to make `their' (governing body) decision, and during this meeting only the apostles and the older men were present."

However, if that were the case, then why does the account say, after Peter speaks (vs.7-11), the following:

"THE ENTIRE MULTITUDE became silent."

That would mean 16 men would constitute the "entire multitude" since no one else would be present as members of the governing body, right? There must have been someone else present! Also, why did Peter say in verse 10:

"Why are YOU making a test of God by imposing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke that neither our forefathers nor we were capable of bearing?"

Was Peter saying that the so-called GOVERNING BODY was `making a test of God by IMPOSING upon the neck of the disciples a yoke?' Of course not! Clearly, Peter was referring to those earlier mentioned in verse 5 namely, those formerly of the `sect of the Pharisees who believed,' that were attempting to force circumcision upon the brethren! These unspiritual men would not listen to what Paul and Barnabas had to say until after Peter (the leading apostle) spoke up! (Compare Acts 15:3-5 with verse 12.) These men were present at this meeting! This was no "Governing Body" decision because James freely gives his `decision' (or opinion) as a matter of public record before an open forum. — Verse 19.

Therefore, who came to "unanimous accord" (vv. 25) in deciding this matter? Let us notice verse 22 which says:

"Then the apostles and the older men TOGETHER WITH THE WHOLE CONGREGATION favored sending chosen men from among them to Antioch along with Paul and Barnabas . . ."

Yes, the whole congregation participated in this decision! But why would everybody need to be included in this decision? Notice verse 24:

"Since we have heard that some from among us have caused you trouble with speeches, trying to subvert your souls, although we did not give them any instructions . . ."

Yes, some from `among us' — Judeans from Jerusalem's locale were teaching this subversion! It was necessary to settle the problem at Jerusalem since here is where it all started! They were the ones that had the problem and not those of Antioch! Notice verse 1:

"And certain men came down from JUDEA and began to teach the brothers: `Unless you get circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.'"

Yes, the issue had to be settled in Judea or Jerusalem! Further, how was the letter addressed? Notice this in verse 23:

"The apostles and the older men, BROTHERS, to those brothers in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia who are from the nations . . . "

Yes the letter came from (1) the apostles, (2) older men, and (3) brothers (from Jerusalem). And that is the way the brothers of Antioch understood it. They understood that this letter was coming from all the brothers in Jerusalem and not a so-called governing body. The brothers in Antioch were concerned about keeping UNITY and `oneness of thought' among the whole association of brothers. Yes, we should all think in agreement regardless of where we live. Is this not the way we should understand important matters that affect our international brotherhood today? — See 1 Corinthians 1:10; 2 Corinthians 13:11; Ephesians 4:3, 13.

THE GOD ORDAINED AUTHORITY IN THE FIRST CENTURY CONGREGATION

The real authority as it was well known back in the first century was not in being a member of the so-called governing body. No, but ambitious individuals who were anxious for prominence and authority sought to be APOSTLES! That is where the real authority was. That is why we read so much about "superfine apostles" and "false apostles." — See 2 Corinthians 11:5, 13; Revelation 2:2.

The Watchtower Society made a very interesting comment concerning the role of the apostles acting as a "restraint" in the first century. Notice this comment:

"During their lifetime the apostles' presence served as a restraint upon the influences of apostasy, holding back the forces of false worship within the Christian congregation. It is evidently to this "restraint" that the apostle Paul referred at 2 Thessalonians 2:7: `True, the mystery of this lawlessness is already at work; but only till he who is right now acting as a restraint gets to be out of the way.' This apostolic influence, including the authority and powers unique with them, continued until the death of JOHN about 100 C.E. The rapid influx of apostasy and false doctrine and practices after the death of the apostles shows that any pretended apostolic successors had none of the restraining influence of the apostles." (See Insight on the Scriptures, Vol. 1, pg. 130, 4.)

Yes, the apostles had the authority and power of `restraint' in the congregations. There was no `governing body' because, as stated by the Watch Tower Society, John, the last apostle was the "restraint" that held back the apostates. Thus, when John died, the "restraint" was gone. If there were a `governing body' functioning in the first century while John was imprisoned, it could have acted as a "restraint," in the absence of John, right? Yes, the "Governing Body" could have acted the part of the "restraint." Had the "Governing Body" also gone bad by the time John was on the Island of Patmos? Well, if that were the case, then John himself would have to `restrain' the evil influence of the "Governing Body," a body of which he was supposed to be a part? Can we not see this is actually a silly notion, namely, that there existed in the first century a "Governing Body?" Yes, John no doubt could have acted the part of a "restraint", using his authority as an "apostle," and not as a member of a so-called "Governing Body!" No such arrangement existed in the first century at all.

The apostles had the authority and not a governing body. It was only after his death, as history tell us, that men began to think of how they could `govern' the flock of God by a group or `council' of Bishops, elders, etc. It was in this unwholesome environment that the Nicean Council gave birth to the blasphemous doctrine of the trinity.

GOVERNING BODY MUCH LIKE THE "SANHEDRIN" OF JESUS' DAY

Therefore, we can see scripturally, that the so-called "Governing Body" arrangement, which is so strictly adhered to and viewed reverently by some 6 million Jehovah's Witnesses today, is actually a farce, a ruse. It is actually an illegal arrangement that can not be truthfully established within the pages of God's Word the Bible. This particular arrangement has held God's people in spiritual captivity and slavery for many years now. The present-day "Governing Body" arrangement is quite like the unscriptural arrangement that governed the Jews when Jesus walked the earth, yes, the "Sanhedrin." As we recall, the "Sanhedrin" was a "council" made up of 71 men. The "High Priest" officiated as it's leader.

The Sanhedrin was made up of Pharisees, Sadduccees, and members of other political factions of the nation. We realize that, scripturally-speaking, this particular arrangement had no validity whatsoever. It was also an illegal arrangement since Jehovah God never authorized it in His Law Covenant. It was this unscriptural arrangement, the Sanhedrin, that served the Devils interests of putting Jesus on trial, providing false witnesses to bring accusations against Jesus, and finally, passing the death sentence upon him and pressuring Pontius Pilate to execute an innocent man. Jehovah's Witnesses today, in like fashion, find themselves under the control of another unscriptural arrangement that is just as oppressive, and just as satanic. It is the present day arrangement of the so-called "Governing Body."

yorww

_____________________________________________________________

Review Questions For The Article: The Governing Body Arrangement -- Is It Scriptural?

1. What composite group does the WTS teach to be the ‘faithful and discreet slave?’ But what is the reality of the situation?

2. In the first century congregations, where did the real authority lie? Is there any scriptural basis for the term ‘Governing Body?’

3. What kind of authority did the apostles have in the first century congregations?

4. Although the WTS may agree with the scriptures that state the apostles had the real authority when the congregations were formed, but what do they argue became the situation later on? What scripture do they use to support this idea?

5. What does the WTS have to admit concerning information found in the Bible about the Governing Body yet what is their official teaching concerning this group as found in the 12/15/71 Watchtower magazine?

6. In considering the account found at Acts chapter 15, why is it wrong to conclude that only sixteen men were present for this meeting where the issue of circumcising Gentiles was discussed?

7. When the decision was made on how to handle this problem, what do we learn from reading Acts 15:22 that helps us to understand that there were more than sixteen men involved in settling this matter? Why was it necessary to involve the whole congregation in this matter?

8. What statement made in the publication, "Insight on the Scriptures, Volume I, page 130, paragraph 4, show that the writers of this publication are aware that there was no ‘governing body’ associated with the first century congregation?

9. When is the most likely time that the idea of a ‘governing body’ would have surfaced?

10. In conclusion, what would you say as to the scriptural legality of the "Governing Body" arrangement that is held so sacred by Jehovah Witnesses? What first century Jewish arrangement would you compare it to?

To get the answers for the review questions CLICK HERE.

***